Gay African-American Judge Nominated to Federal Bench

This afternoon, President Barack Obama nominated out Judge William L. Thomas to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. If confirmed, Judge Thomas would become the second out black federal judge, the first being Judge Deborah Batts of the Southern District of New York who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994.

This breaking news has close ties to Pennsylvania. The Honorable William L. Thomas is a 1991 graduate of Washington and Jefferson College, located in Washington County, PA. While at W&J, he helped create the first student multi-cultural organization, the Cultural Awareness Support Enrichment Group.

Following his undergraduate studies, Judge Thomas went directly to Temple University’s Beasley School of Law in Philadelphia for his JD. He graduated in 1994 and was admitted to the Florida Bar in 1995.

After graduating law school, he became an Assistant Public Defender in the Miami-Dade County Public Defender’s office. From 1997-2005, he was an Assistant Federal Public Defender in the Southern District of Florida. Since 2005, Judge Thomas is currently serving as a judge in Florida’s Eleventh Circuit.

The KSV is working to find out more information from his Pennsylvania roots and will post more information as it become available.

PSEC State of the Movement Address

Greetings all! This letter was sent to PSEC Coordinating Committee members in preparation for the Fall convening. The state youth meeting November 9-11 at Bucknell University is focused on leadership growth and adaptability. The PSEC Executive Committee asked us to post this publically for you to learn more about the successes and challenges which face youth-led organizing today. PSEC strives for transparency and accountability for the youth represented by the coalition.

 

Dear Pennsylvania LGBTQ Youth Friends,

We are now at a critical turning point in our youth-led LGBTQ movement in Pennsylvania. The direction we will take together is to be decided directly by you and your organizations. Nothing can stop us if we all to rise up and work together toward the change we seek in our commonwealth.
 
To realize the power we have claimed as a generation, we must understand our coordinated effort as an integral part of our leadership. No longer can we see the full equality and safety of LGBTQ youth in Pennsylvania as an outside issue.
 
When we began our joint effort last year to build an authentic LGBTQ youth advocacy community in Pennsylvania, some adults laughed at us. A statewide youth-led LGBTQ advocacy organization had never been attempted before. Many leaders of mainstream equality organizations only saw youth then as pawns for fundraising, incapable of creating change. A small group of us banded together and declared that it was finally our time to rise up and take full ownership of our role in advancing the dignity and equal access for LGBTQ Pennsylvanians.
 
Since then, our partnership with the LGBTQ movement as a whole has experienced incredible progress. We have solidified our bonds with thousands of LGBTQ youth across the state. Our landmark anti-bullying bill, the Pennsylvania Safe Schools Act, has become hallmark legislation in securing the safety of all young people in our commonwealth. We have held numerous statewide conferences to coordinate our efforts. Our presence is deeply felt in Harrisburg and in the communities we have helped change through policy.
 
However, our darkest times are yet to come. We will all be tested in our endurance and strength — by both the oppression we face in society, as well as within the LGBTQ community. It will be up to each of us to remain resilient as we meet our future opposition.
 
If I were to personally respond to all the acts of aggression I have witnessed and been subject to as a youth organizer, I would have little time to do anything else. Indeed, our storyline is so much more than merely a plea to support LGBTQ youth advocacy in spite of the barriers we face because of our age. That would not lift our spirits up as high as we are meant to go. While it is important to be aware of our shared struggle, it will be our self-determination that moves us toward victory. Our perseverance and commitment toward justice will be both our testimony and our source of strength — that a group of young upstarts can indeed lead a state and our county — into a new dawn of meaningful youth empowerment.
 
While PSEC directly represents nearly 50 member organizations in over 30 counties, we see new youth leaders facing difficulty in understanding the gravity of our joint efforts. This is the most prevalent issue which plagues youth organizing: sustainability of effective leaders. For two years since I began this work, I have consistently rejected the notion that youth are weak or unreliable — instead choosing to believe that each of us more powerful than we know.
 
Many of your organizations have new executive boards. At times, some leaders did not effectively transition information to new affiliate members about what it is we are doing together. Let us clarify any misinformation. Your former leaders were official delegates from your community who voted unanimously to form PSEC, wrote the organization’s constitution and founding principles, and believed firmly in our ability to work together toward common goals as GSAs in Pennsylvania.
 
It is deeply concerning to our coalition leaders to learn that some of your organization members have begun to see our collective movement as “outsiders coming in.” We are here because your predecessors willed this coalition into existence. We are here because there is too much unfinished work for us to face alone. PSEC is you, and always has been. Your commitment and vision for a better Pennsylvania is where the promise of our coalition now rests.
 
The time for us to have conversations about the relevance of coming together is now over. It has to – it must be – realized by you. No other individual will light your flame; you must find your own spark and march. As an organizer, my job is only to help provide you the tools which you need. You are the ones to define your destiny.
 
Our collective force is based on the tenant that we are stronger together than we are divided. Whether it is improving our lives on our campuses, coming to the assistance of others in our network, or forming a collective strategy for sweeping change across our commonwealth; the interconnection of our futures is undeniable. When one of us is struck with injustice, so are we all.
 
When a trans youth is beaten after school in rural Crawford County — we are called to unite. When a lesbian student in Scranton is forced out of her foster home and onto the street — we must help her. When a gay teen is bullied to such an extreme he takes his last step in front of a tractor trailer along the Susquehanna River — we must be there to give him hope.
 
We are together in our journey as LGBTQ youth. Our lives are interwoven throughout the farmlands and skylines across the Keystone state. The blood of our community runs through you just as it runs through me. We cannot allow our unity to be perceived so narrowly, as an external presence or merely as an outsourced responsibility for a first year student on your executive board. This must be your own leadership. The stakes have become too high: they are our very lives and futures. All young LGBTQ Pennsylvanians are invested in our coalition — whether they believe in our cause or not.
 
The new leaders we are concerned with have begun varying levels of dissociation in the push toward equality, which has led to uneven levels of participation. We have learned that there is no substitute for full, active, and authentic participation. Without it — in absence of your leadership — our coalition disintegrates. That is why the founding members made attendance as merits for voting power. All member organizations are expected to show up to the table to make informed decisions that drive us forward. Without your input, others are burdened in making decisions on your behalf. Trust amongst us as peers cannot occur if others make decisions for you. These are expectations we must place on ourselves to build an effective advocacy coalition.
 
These new leaders take issue with PSEC as a chore. That between homework, jobs, and on-campus events there is hardly time or interest to involve themselves in connecting their campus organizations with the state. Yet, this assertion distinctly fails to point out the very forms of oppression which lead to youth self-defeatism. Young people are told all through our childhood and school years that we are not strong enough to take on executive leadership. We are put through training programs which are intended to make us ‘the leaders of tomorrow’ instead of the leaders of today.
 
The messages we get as youth are that we are consultants and clients to the non-profit organizations that serve us, and at best, can intern with the organizations that we have interest in. Making excuses time and again for being unable to attend meetings and actions is to accept the labels which society has placed on us: that we are powerless and just do not care enough. In turn, to identify that our greatest challenge lies in our ability to lead our own movement is a difficult task. Bigotry must be combated with unyielding love and driven away — however, our true empowerment can only be generated when personal accountability is met with an unwavering vision for a better tomorrow.
 
We are one with the generations of youth before us who challenged society to lean forward into progress. It was only 50 years ago when students exactly like you and I, sacrificed their lives to have a voice in social justice communities. The women’s suffrage movement of the 1910s and civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s were not driven by charismatic leaders or political action committees — they were secured by ordinary folks like you and I. Their youth components proved to be essential to legislative victories. Together, youth were more than a picket and protest outlet but a coordinated force of change agents. From Stonewall to Act UP — we must not allow our generation to be disempowered or disengaged with our own call to action.
 
As those trusted with the legacy of LGBTQ youth for generations to come, we must realize change starts at home. In many cases, the activities within our organizations have all been done before. We continue to bring the same dozen speakers and performers to our campuses. We screen the same movies year after year. If we continue to reinvent the wheel of our organizations, the change we seek will never become bigger than the auditorium walls holding our largest drag show. We should consider a paradigm shift of our organizations in order to grow our communities. What has never been attempted — until now — is communicating between our groups to build a bold framework for our community. Now, we are raising our power up to the level where legislators listen to our voices, as we unite in Harrisburg, and in Washington DC, to fight for equality.
 
A youth coalition works only when our organizations’ members understand why it is important to turn our struggle into collective action. Like a ship carrying us to freedom, if all of us do not get on board and do what we can to steer us to safety: our boat will not cross any ocean, and injustice will continue to harm those left behind.
 
If new leaders lose sight of this path, organizations will begin to stand in apathy on the sidelines. Indeed, there are those who misunderstand what a coalition is, by expecting it to provide them with services without putting in effort into the collective. Others channel selfishness into their work — individuals for whom personal power and ego is the only thing that matters. I am unable to keep track of how many people have collected community awards by discussing the issues we face, but halting to step into the trenches where we work. These leaders must be guided toward group-centered leadership and shown that progress is possible when we all put in the necessary energy toward our goals.
 
Harvey Milk was a hero to many of us because he stood against those who would seek to make their egos larger than the issues, or make politics out of simple coordination. Milk once said: “Last week I got a phone call from Altoona, Pennsylvania, and my election gave somebody else, one more person, hope. And after all, that’s what this is all about. It’s not about personal gain, not about ego, not about power — it’s about giving those young people out there in the Altoona, Pennsylvanias, hope. You gotta give them hope.”
 
As we were forming our coalition, we knew that our calling has great importance. Believing that we could successfully challenge the LGBTQ movement’s expectations of youth, we knew we had no other choice but to follow through with our plans. While we knew it would be a difficult journey — we took the necessary preparations to ready ourselves for the battles ahead. We started to play with the ‘big boys’ and became an established force.
 
We have sat in numerous meetings with agencies trying to start LGBTQ youth programs that consistently execute programs which patronize or pathologize the LGBTQ youth experience. Many of these fail to address intersectionality, privilege, and the root causes of our issues. We need to be angry, because if not, we are complacent with the current programs which limit our engagement and commodify our identities.
 
As some of you know, our formation was not as seamless as we had hoped. Your organizations stood up to the adult bullies who tried to eliminate us as we were forming PSEC. For years we found ourselves the targets of false agreements by our adult leaders who assured us change in their organizations. Channeling the lockstep of how the National Women’s Party and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee formed from their establishment counterparts, we spent countless hours discussing the weighted decision. Following depraved indifference and explicit harassment by some adult leaders, we opted to transform our informal social network into an independent advocacy coalition.
 
At times, we continue to be intimidated both personally and professionally by members of other non-profit organizations. They see us as uncontrollable kids who could challenge their power. It is the idea of ‘unmanaged’ youth which frightens them. For years they have made profit off of our image — proclaiming they work on our behalf without truly representing us. Our only response has been to meet the adults with an unending capacity for love. In taking the higher road and not responding to their attacks, we become stronger ourselves.
 
I am at a loss as to whether we will ever know why some adults had such contempt for us — or that a limited few number of youth do not yet understand the gravity of these actions. We can presuppose it relates to their leaders’ egos and lust for power. It is non-profit politics, and surely we do not need to engage with it. We may face intimidation, but we must be strong. Political gain is not why I came here to fight, and I certainly do not believe any of us should be concerned with it either. So let us move on.
 
While some may look back on our decision and ask us why we elected to be independent, we can firmly respond with clarity: it was our fate to rise up. They may say, would it not have been easier to rely on adults for your power? The answer is no. Adults cannot speak for youth, only we can. As Audre Lorde said, “the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house.” As youth are relatively unattached people, we are highly mobile and adaptable. Creating our distinct community has helped complement the equality movement as a whole. When there are multiple voices behind a social movement we all become louder. Multiple constituencies employing a variety of tactics can make a highly effective organizing front.
 
We in fact became the first youth-led statewide LGBTQ advocacy organization in the nation. We believed that if we can be successful in Pennsylvania, our model of youth advocacy can be deployed to other states. Should we prove ourselves sustainable, we potentially have a national movement in our grasp.
 
Unfortunately, adultism is just one of many internal challenges within the broader LGBTQ equality movement. Unlike the beginnings of many social justice movements in past eras, the LGBTQ equality community has become a series of well funded non-profit organizations battling each other for limited financial resources and messaging power. Independent grassroots organizing is at a very low level.

How did our movement become a playground for privileged non-profit groups? Dr. Frank Kameny lived a life of modesty and poverty. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. would share motel rooms with other leaders when he traveled. I would respond that it was when we, the average young folks on the ground, accepted this as our reality for the LGBTQ equality movement. It was when we settled for letting our boldest actions to be wearing purple one day a year, or signing an online petition that would never be read by the targeted politician. That we were only to be consulted by these groups in determining an agenda. Our journey with PSEC challenges this entire system by saying: as LGBTQ youth, without being paid, and sacrificing all the resources we can, we are active leaders in this fight.

The mission of our coalition is to make our bonds so close, and our collective vision so clear, that no challenge can be too large for us. The truth is that our state has lagged for far too long on the journey toward fairness and equality. The first LGBTQ equality legislation was a bare bones non-discrimination bill in 1976. Although 69 pieces of equality legislation having been introduced in the General Assembly since that time, not one statutory law currently protects LGBTQ Pennsylvanians. Thirty municipalities have non-discrimination ordinances and a sprinkling of domestic partner benefit policies exist, but again, the larger movement for LGBTQ equality has yet to even begin in the Keystone state.

We have been delayed for decades in our quest to form this movement. Pennsylvanians have been denied the social progress that has been advanced in other states. The absence of progress can only be explained by the sheer lack of coordination and interest of our forbearers. Let us not be classified by historical trajectories or perceptions of youth as unreliable. The time is now, not later, to press on.

Patience to fit this movement into your schedules cannot be a valid option for us anymore. Our lives — and those of thousands of LGBTQ youth – are on the line. It may be easy to dismiss their pleas if you have never been at the end of a rope. However, as LGBTQ youth, we are all inextricably linked with the fact that we have come out. We were faced with societal forces which we were told limited us — made us different or shameful in some way. Together with our many beautiful and different identities we can push together to address racism, ableism, classism, sexism, and religious intolerance. We should know that our actions can directly help save others’ lives. Many of us did not have a support system. Our convergence is a giant helping hand stretching across our state to isolated youth — giving them hope that they are not alone.

I trust in you an admission of our most significant challenge ahead. It is your organization’s very commitment to this common good. We must work to empower all young people – to lift the veil that covers their eyes to the importance of our unity. To those who would feel that this struggle is not relevant to them or not worth their time are themselves the very obstruction that holds our full power back. If we can secure their dedication, our river will flow over any dam that tries to stop us.

It is time for us all to have the courageous and honest conversations with those in our organizations about solidarity. We assuredly have our different opinions — but being unenthusiastic about change is the seed which leads to divestment. It is not why any of us were elected to our leadership posts. Healthy debate amongst us regarding which tactics to employ and campaigns to launch reflects a strong community. However, for us to have leaders in our midst who believe that “equality will eventually come” and “I am not one to do activist things” leaves our cause mired. As we find ourselves less as a meeting of delegates but truly as each other’s keeper — nothing can stand in our way from combating prejudice and bigotry where it exists.

I understand these may be bold claims to make. That some of you may be overwhelmed by, or even taken aback by these assertions. I did not intend to make any of us feel discouraged. Many of us are stretched thin with all our obligations. But we must not lose our hope. For as leaders we carry that hope for countless young people who look us for guidance. Nevertheless, we must deal with these issues openly. We can continue to treat the symptoms of a disease, but only when we all agree to take the antidote will we be able to heal and move forward.

I have been to your campuses. I have walked your hallways and entered your student unions. While visiting I embrace every moment and dream of the day when we organize masses of students to march for the equal rights of all people. Who will come forward to lead your community toward that day? Let us show the world that our capacity to love is stronger than any obstacle in our way.

There is so much for us to discuss and I greatly look forward to seeing you and your representatives at our next state meeting. I have the utmost respect for your leadership and am humbled to take our next steps together to ensure a brighter future for us all.

 

Yours in solidarity,
Jason Landau Goodman
PSEC, Executive Director

Opinion: Purplewashing

Last Friday, thousands of students and adults donned purple in solidarity with LGBTQ youth who are bullied in school. While I support the effort to raise visibility of the violence we face in our schools – I struggle with the issue becoming a commodity. Allow me to coin a term:

Purplewashing: the act of branding anti-LGBTQ bullying as an issue to be professionally marketed.

The harassment faced by LGBTQ students (and youth perceived to be LGBTQ) is widespread. You know the statistics.

Spirit Day may be a red-letter way of showing unity in some communities. However, I urge LGBTQ advocates to approach the day with caution. The idea is spreading that trendy activities such as wearing purple could be standalone ways to combat bullying, rather than accepting ownership of systemic and institutional causes of school violence.

Spirit Day was created through grassroots efforts back in 2010. That autumn, the mainstream media took hold of the suicides of gay youth for the first time. These tragedies included the back-to-back deaths of Tyler Clementi, Seth Walsh, Raymond Chase, Asher Brown, William Lukas, Justin Aaberg, and others. It was a very sad time as the general public was learning about how frequent LGBTQ youth suicide is.

Our Pennsylvania LGBTQ youth network supported over 25 vigils that October, called Pennsylvania Night to Live, to remember the countless youth who had been driven to end their lives related to extreme bullying. Vigils, concerts, and memorial services were held in communities across the country. Later that month, the idea organically spread through social media and celebrities to wear purple for a day in solidarity against anti-LGBTQ bullying, which became a national event. The non-profit media organization GLAAD eventually won the bid to take the reins of the day now known as ‘Spirit Day.’

This year I began to notice the day being driven by adult service providers and adult-run organizations more than the past two years. The adults in many major LGBTQ non-profit organizations posted pictures online of their staff all in purple. I even saw Esurance in my Facebook mini-feed about the importance of wearing purple. It was viral.

These concerns are not new to visibility movements. In the early 1990s, the breast cancer awareness and prevention community was struggling. Women were experiencing barriers to treatment and social stigma.  They were mad and things needed to be done – and so they marched in protest. Great progress was made with healthcare providers and insurance companies, and we were finally able to see breast cancer prevention become a national conversation. The rallies changed over time. The marches became fundraising races and walks.

Over the past two decades, breast cancer awareness advocates have promoted pink to become a multi-million dollar advocacy industry. These efforts are truly important to raise critical funds for prevention and research for a cure. However, some critics claim the global pink ribbon culture has become a professional fundraising machine. Numerous articles, books, and documentaries have been made on how the pink marketplace may be more interested in funding sources than direct service. Breast Cancer Action’s Think Before You Pink campaign has been advocating for more fundraising transparency over the past decade. Indeed, we’ve seen what happens when so much pink power goes to one organization with Susan G. Komen’s disastrous decision (and reversal) to cut funding to Planned Parenthood earlier this year.

Cities from Pittsburgh to Philadelphia light up their skylines pink this month. Perhaps one day soon they will go purple too.

Our efforts for visibility must be tied with direct action. This year it was a struggle working with several partners to convince them that we must wear more than purple to change policies and combat hatred. Some folks may feel like they are “doing their part” just by wearing a color. It’s a start, but having courageous conversations and getting involved with advocacy for safer schools can more directly lead to the change we seek. Instead of organizing to wear a color, I would press LGBTQ advocates to be more angry that often too little is being done.

We must realize the potential ramifications of marketing anti-LGBTQ bullying as a topical issue. The serious plight of youth who suffer from anti-LGBTQ bullying can be easily glossed over with high-fashion fundraising events that fail to address intersectionality and privilege. My mind races thinking of the Purple Walks ahead of us.

“Suicide is now sexy”, is how I’ve heard a friend from New York City regard LGBTQ donor culture today – that more gay male socialites are tending to flock to cocktail parties for the Trevor Project over other groups. Yes, clearly that’s an endgame for social change, when anti-LGBTQ bullying organizations are securing penthouse floors for their Manhattan headquarters by hosting the hottest VIP fundraisers in town.

We need to be angry, because if not, we are complacent.

Join an organization in marching. Help run a community-wide forum on bullying at your local school. We should not believe that sending money at an issue, or wearing a color alone, will entirely shift a cultural stigma – especially when the issue is intricately linked to policy.

A lesson learned from last week: the bigots also went national on Spirit Day. The Illinois Family Institute flooded the East Aurora School District board of directors with emails to strip the protections they recently put in place for trans students. On Spirit Day they voted to remove those policies and discuss firing the staff who proposed them. Imagine, if everyone who wore purple wrote letters to school boards that day, maybe, more communities could preserve and advance protections for LGBTQ students. Absolutely, visibility is needed, but policies and action certainly help.

Before the swarm of non-profits start planning on how to go even more purple next year, let us think critically to ensure that LGBTQ youth and bullying is not just an issue to be bought, traded, or sold. We, the students, are the youth struggling with this violence. We are strong and resilient too.

Please, don’t take wearing purple as taking a final stand. Our boldest moves will come when national safe schools action is driven by the students ourselves.

Jason Landau Goodman is a student at the University of Pennsylvania and the Executive Director of the Pennsylvania Student Equality Coalition. He can be reached at jgoodman@pennsec.org.

Scranton Native to Lead Outserve/SLDN

Allyson Robinson has just been selected to become the new Executive Director of Outserve/SDLN.

The two largest organizations working on behalf of LGBTQ servicemembers is set to merge this month. Following the repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, the groups see a stronger future together as one force.

Allyson is a native of Scranton, PA and has become a visible leader in the national LGBTQ equality movement. She recently finished a several year post at the Human Rights Campaign as the Associate Director for Diversity.

Allyson was the keynote speaker last year for TransCentral PA’s Keystone Conference in Harrisburg. Also a Scranton native is Mara Keisling, who is the founding Executive Director of the National Center for Transgender Equality. Allyson has now become the first trans person to be the Executive Director of a national LGBTQ organization that is not trans-specific.

We sincerely appreciate the groundbreaking leadership on the national level by Pennsylvanians. There is important work to be done to secure the equal access and safety of all servicemembers – certainly with the advocacy ahead to allow trans members to serve openly and with pride. With Allyson at the helm, we look forward to great progress ahead.

Here is Allyson’s welcome video – featuring several national LGBTQ leaders including HRC’s Chad Griffin and Sue Fulton of Knight’s Out: http://youtu.be/9I4Ny1RrXSk

Jason Landau Goodman is a student at the University of Pennsylvania and the Executive Director of the Pennsylvania Student Equality Coalition. He can be reached at jgoodman@pennsec.org.

Another Matthew Shepard article

Another year, another Matthew Shepard article

The murder of Matthew Shepard was 14 years ago yesterday. In 1998 I was eight years old, probably had a vague idea that there was such a thing as being “gay”, and would not learn about Matthew Shepard for years to come. I would not have known that he was raped three years prior to his murder, contributing to drugs and depressions in his college years. I would not known that he was robbed, tortured, assaulted severely, and tied to a fence to die by two people who had said they would give him a ride home. I would not have known about the Westboro Baptist Church; that they held signs at his funeral saying “Fag Matt in Hell.”

The controversy of the ensuing trial has been well documented: the defendants’ attempt at a “gay panic defense” [claiming to have been made psychotic by the offensiveness of a gay sexual advance]; inability to prosecute as a hate-crime. Ultimately, McKinney and Henderson both received life-sentences, which seems fair to me. And yet discussion of Matthew Shepard continues.

Yesterday evening a close friend shared with me a powerfully emotional spoken-word poem, “Eleven Years” by Sierra DeMulder (written last year). It is highly worth a listen for anyone who enjoys spoken word. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5RbcdO38pk) DeMulder vividly describes how Shepard was found tied to a post, mistaken for a scarecrow, and makes an emotional connection with her family.

Would there be any difference from 1998 Wyoming to 2012 Pennsylvania? In a sense, Matthew Shepard’s case has had an impact here, as area universities have staged productions of The Laramie Project and his case has been written about in a myriad articles like this one. What hasn’t changed is that people are still dying for being LGBTQ. Let’s hope that there will never be another case quite as gruesome as Matthew Shepard’s. Let’s also not forget about the bullying and harassment that had lead Pennsylvanians to take their owns lives. And once we combat bullying, let’s not stop until we have combated homelessness and inaccessible healthcare and all of the other barriers to safe and meaningful lives for the everyone in the LGBTQ community.

Ben Safran is a senior at Haverford College in Delaware County, PA. He can be reached at bsafran@haverford.edu.

Trans murder victims in Philadelphia

The recent shooting of a transgender woman and her mother in the Northern Liberties neighborhood of Philadelphia has left a community wondering when transphobic violence will end, and how much is being done to stop it?

On the evening of October 7th, a transgender woman and her mother were shot in their Northern Liberties home, killing the mother and leaving the woman in critical condition. While the motivation for the shooting has been stated to be robbery, none of the other occupants of the house were harmed. This shooting comes just a month after the murder of Kyra Cordova, a Philadelphia transgender woman who was active in AIDS education and outreach. Two years ago,  Stacey Blahnik, a transgender woman, was found strangled to death in her Philadelphia home. No arrests have been made in the case, nor suspect identified. Likewise, no suspects have been identified in the murder of Kyra Cordova. While we can’t be sure what happened on the evening of October 7th, we can continue to seek answers until justice is found for the victims of transphobic violence.

Rates of violent crime are high in Philadelphia, and affect citizens regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity. However, individuals identifying as trans face higher rates of violence and discrimination in almost every aspect of life, including employment, health care, and access to public services. The lack of government advocacy for trans rights in Pennsylvania, particularly Philadelphia, is disheartening, and disturbing. Trans individuals are just as much citizens as cisgender individuals are, and deserve full protection under the law. It sounds so obvious, yet, statistics show that trans individuals nationwide are subject to mistreatment by the justice system, as well as their neighbors, families, and community.

Washington DC is particularly infamous for a recent series of unsolved murders of trans individuals. However, the DC community is taking steps to make their city more aware of trans issues. This fall, the Washington DC Office of Human Rights launched a historic advertising campaign advocating for respect for all gender identities. While a visibility campaign can’t heal years of transphobic violence, they show that DC is taking an official stand against the hatred of trans people.

Pennsylvania communities need to take a public stand against hate as well. The 2nd Annual Philly Trans March last week was groundbreaking and significantly important for rallying trans advocates. Thinking proactively: an organized City government campaign that promotes the acceptance of trans Philadelphians could help gain widespread support against this violence. While it would not end transphobia overnight, it could be the first step in ending a legacy of unsolved murders.

Victoria Martin is a second year student at West Chester University. She is originally from Shippensburg, PA in Cumberland County. She can be reached at vmartin@pennsec.org.

Former Pittsburgh Pirates Owner Comes Out

Fresh out of the closet locker room! The recent coming out of former Pittsburgh Pirates owner and CEO (from 1996-2007), Kevin McClatchy, shines light on a multi-faceted anti-LGBTQ culture in professional American athletics. McClatchy, who reveals his sexuality today in the New York Times, claims that he was dissuaded from coming out while he was still working in the world of sports by the homophobic attitudes of his colleagues. In an interesting turn of events, McClatchy met his current partner through their mutual friend—a staff member of former US Senator of Pennsylvania and presidential candidate Rick Santorum. Santorum, a notable opponent of marriage equality, is presumably as surprised as we are.

 

While great strides are being made in LGBTQ visibility in the media, politics, and business – even in the military – we still see professional athletics as lagging behind. In 2012, the athletic community has a better chance to lead on the respect and acceptance of LGBT folks than ever. In 1975, David Kopay of the NFL became the first major league athlete to publicly disclose his sexuality. Since Kopay, very few major league athletes have come out as LGBTQ. Both Kopay and McClatchy have expressed that the culture of athletics is largely not LGBTQ friendly. In one extremely troubling incident in 1985, an offensive lineman for the University of Pittsburgh attempted suicide after having sexual urges for another man.

 

Hopefully, McClathy’s recent coming out will encourage more figures in the world of professional sports – both players and their corporate leaders – to come out themselves, and open up an opportunity for dialogue about ending the deep seeded homophobic attitudes prevalent in sports culture. Anyways, isn’t a locker room just one big shared closet?

 

Further Reading: http://espn.go.com/otl/world/timeline.html

This post is by Victoria Martin, West Chester University ’15.

DADT Repeal One Year Later

Posted by Victoria Martin
West Chester University, Class of 2015

One year ago, the United States repealed the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, putting an end to years of silence among lesbian, gay, and bisexual soldiers who have served, and continue to serve our nation.


The history of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell began with the administration of former President Bill Clinton, who signed the policy into law in October of 1993. Before the passage of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell there was an explicit ban on homosexual soldiers serving in the military in any capacity. The policy allowed lesbian, gay, and bisexual soldiers to serve in the military, provided they did not disclose their sexuality or engage in any “homosexual activities” while in the service. The policy did not forbid heterosexual service members from openly disclosing their relationships, or engaging in romantic and sexual activity. Additionally, the policy was to forbid inquires into the sexual orientation of a service member. However, in the fifteen years the policy was in effect, an estimated 13,650 soldiers were discharged after being “outed” in some capacity. Soldiers discharged due to sexual orientation were in some cases subject to receiving less than honorable discharges, despite their service records, and were not allowed to reenlist.


President Barack Obama said that he was favor of repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell while campaigning for President in 2008, and confirmed that he would work to end the ban during the 2010 State of the Union Address. This position was backed up by several government and military officials, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates.


Opponents of allowing lesbian, gay, and bisexual service members serve openly claimed that morale would be lowered, cohesion would be threatened, and the military would see a mass exodus of heterosexual service members. A statement from a group of 1,167 retired admirals and generals claimed that, “Repeal… would undermine recruiting and retention, impact leadership at all levels, have adverse effects on the willingness of parents who lend their sons and daughters to military service, and eventually break the All-Volunteer Force.”


President Barack Obama signed the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell in December of 2010, and after the military underwent training programs in preparation, the act was officially repealed on September 20, 2011 . Contrary to the beliefs of opponents of the repeal, open service has reportedly been a non-issue. A study released by the Palm Center, conducted by both military and private civilians, found that there had been no negative impact upon the military upon allowing lesbian, gay, and bisexual soldiers to serve openly. In fact, retention of personnel, readiness, and cohesion were found to be entirely unchanged, and there was no net change found in service member morale. Service members reported that they felt allowing their fellow soldiers to serve openly had not affected the way the military operated in any capacity. The Palm Center study concluded that the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell has had very little impact in the daily activities of the military, apart from increased trust and openness among soldiers.


While the military had made great strides in the rights of lesbian, gay, and bisexual service members in the past year, there is still much progress to be made. Under the Defense of Marriage Act, same-sex spouses of service members are not entitled to full military benefits. Service members discharged under Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell have been unable to receive compensation from the government for benefits they would have been entitled to had they not been discharged, or had they received an honorable discharge.


Trans citizens are currently unable to serve in the military. The military treats identifying as trans* as a mental illness, and thus denies admission into the armed forces to those who are not cisgender. Policy also forbids enlistment by anyone who has undergone surgery on the genitalia, thus barring post-operative trans* individuals from serving. “Cross-dressing” is considered grounds for denying enlistment, or discharge. Recently, veteran Ashley Ackley, whom previously identified as John Ackley while serving in the National Guard, petitioned to be reenlisted. Ackley served in the military for six years, and her service included a tour in Iraq. Ackley sought the help of several military recruiters, before she was definitively denied readmission, under the policy on mental illness and gender reassignment surgery. Ackley is currently a member of the Inactive Reserve, though in an interview with CNN, she expressed the opinion that it would be unlikely for her to be called into service from the reserve.


The consequences of the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell have proven to be positive for both service members, and the military at large. The first same-sex marriage of a service member was held on midnight of September 19, 2011, by Navy Lt. Gary Ross and his husband, a civilian. Military chaplains are allowed to officiate same-sex marriages, in states which they may be held. Service members discharged under the policy have been able to reenlist, and return to their jobs serving their country. Soldiers no longer need to live in fear of being discharged simply for being who they are. While great progress has been made in a single year, the nation must continue to work forward to a military where citizens of all sexual orientations and gender identities can serve their country openly.

Further Resources:

The Palm Center: One Year Out
http://www.palmcenter.org/publications/dadt/one_year_out


Ashley Ackles interview with CNN
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2012/06/06/transgender-veteran-on-frontlines-of-change.com

The New Normal – Student Review


















The pilot to The New Normal starts with the augmented chord of an Apple Computer’s error tone. Compared to many television shows portraying the LGBT community, so far this sitcom has relatively few errors. (Well, okay, there may some errors in the family matriarch’s statement “I am extremely tolerant to all peoples: when they opened that Chipotel [sic.] here I was the first of my friends to go, and that is Spanish food.”) Perhaps the most complex character in the pilot episode, she is a strong and powerful woman who has been dealt challenging life experiences. She is also–as her great-granddaughter puts it– a bigot.

I’m not sure whether the target audience of this sitcom is LGBTQ and allied youth. I personally cannot yet relate to any of the characters. Certainly not the upscale gay couple (sweet as they are) with their spoiled pooch having a baby, or their first pick for a surrogate mother who tries to blackmail them, or the single mother with the precocious daughter. Moreover, not all of the jokes worked for me.

A significant problem is that all of the characters—gay and straight—have relatively stereotypical personalities. We have the wealthy gay couple with the effeminate and the masculine partner the precocious quirky child born into the dysfunctional family (a la Lisa Simpson et al), the struggling small-town single-mother, and the politically-backward elder.

That said, this show looks to be one of the better recent portrayals of a gay family in a major network sitcom. It could become stronger with development of the existing characters, and hopefully exploration of class and gender struggles that could grow organically from the pilot. As the first prime-time sitcom on a major network in which the gay couple are the main characters, rather than taking a supporting role, if The New Normal shapes postive public views of same-sex parents that probably would not be a bad thing.

The pilot had an estimated 6.9 million viewers, which is considered decent since many saw the episode online in advance. NBC’s Utah affiliate elected not to carry the program citing the possibility of overly crude content. One Million Moms [not surprisingly] is boycotting the show.

So far, the reaction to the pilot on Facebook has been mixed. Leaving aside the homophobic posts, some viewers found it “witty” and “charming” while others expressed concerns about lack of racial diversity in the cast as well as cliché characters. Indeed, there is nothing particularly original or deviant about the storyline so far. Then again, this is not The New Deviant; it is The New Normal.

-Ben Safran, Haverford College ’13

Opinion: Looking up at the Stars

Tomorrow, Zach Wahls, a young icon for LGBT equality, will address the Democratic National Convention. It’s a great moment for the LGBT rights movement to have the child of a same-gender parent home to address a national political convention.

However, I pause at the channels that promoted his rise to stardom.

Since I began organizing in this movement, I’ve seen a cult of personality form around young LGBT heroes. Like clockwork, once a year, adult leaders seem to let catapult one youth into national stardom. I am humbled that some of these youth are friends of mine, but I want to dig deeper at the way the LGBT movement works to embrace individual leaders. I believe that in the best contexts, celebrities can provide inspiration, but at its lowest, display shallowness. Too often today, we are presented with individual icons talking about themselves – rarely with leaders representing movements of people.

In 2010, we welcomed Katie Miller to the stage. She boldly resigned from the military at West Point just before DADT was repealed. She became a fixture on national news programs speaking out as a young person against discrimination in the armed forces. Since then, she has articulated a message of inclusion she shares at events across the county.

In 2011, we celebrated Daniel Hernandez. While he asserts that he was not an LGBT activist, he happened to be gay and a student intern with Rep. Gabrielle Giffords at the time she and others were attacked. His quick support of the congresswoman proved to be a great help to her survival – and Daniel has since been hailed as a hero across the United States and accepted numerous honors.

This year we come to Zach Wahls, who rose to fame with his passionate testimony defending marriage equality on the Iowa House floor. He has written a book about growing up in a same-gender parent household and spoken at many large forums. Moreover, Wahls has embraced activism in opposition to the boy scouts’ ban on gay members.

Generally, these young icons come from privileged backgrounds, or come to fame because they are close to channels of political power. We can only ponder if they would all be regulars on CNN if Katie had not come from a prominent military background, if Zach was not as charismatic, or even, if Daniel worked for a conservative congresswoman. Would even their stories be heard? We can be excited and sure they have bright futures ahead in politics and leadership.

Looking at the stars of the LGBT community, what is a young, transgender youth of color supposed to look up and see? We can only hope one day for a reflection.

The pattern of LGBT youth heroes seems to send the message that primarily white and privileged youth are the ones who deserve to be promoted to the national stage, literally. I write this intentionally as a white, gay student, in solidarity with all the stories buried and forgotten.

The Civil Rights movement of the 1960’s grappled tremendously with this issue. Leaders such as Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Roy Wilkins would regularly draw thousands of people to hear them speak. Mostly they were male and successful community leaders.

Ella Baker, a proponent of forming the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, the major student-run arm of the civil rights movement, believed that a community should lead together, instead of being the followers of a few charming individuals.

In a biography of Ella, former SNCC participant Joanne Grant writes that she “believed strongly in the importance of organizing people to formulate their own questions, to define their own problems, and to find their own solutions…she held firmly to the concept of group-centered leadership rather than a leadership-centered group.”

I am concerned that spending so much time honoring celebrities over humbling ourselves to local advocacy can further LGBT community stratification. At least, it would be nice for us to push the larger LGBT movement to give the spotlight more to ordinary folks we can believe in too.

In the end, civil rights movements have seen their greatest successes when normal, everyday people banded together to realize their power. It wasn’t by carrying anyone else’s autograph – but by becoming our own heroes.

Zach Wahls clearly deserves this speaking engagement. And I will definitely watch and cheer him on. But in my mind, I’ll be waiting for the day a national political convention invites a queer youth to the stage to tell her story of fighting for the lives of others – and not just commentating on it with a few calculated talking points from an agent.

How long should I hold my breath?

This opinion post was written by Jason Landau Goodman, a student at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, and can be reached at jgoodman@pennsec.org.