Pennsylvania Honors Transgender Day of Remembrance

Across the nation and the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the international Trans Day of Remembrance (TDOR) was observed yesterday, November 20.  One of the highly visible TDOR vigils took place on the steps of the Pennsylvania Capitol building. Trans activists and allies from across the state gathered for a ceremony honoring the fifteen known trans individuals who were murdered in the country this year as the result of hate crimes, including Philadelphian Kyra Cordova. The event was organized by TransCentral PA and included several speakers from Pennsylvania LGBTQ organizations, beginning with the president of TransCentral PA, Jeanine Ruhsam. The second part of the ceremony was a candle-lit vigil, in which volunteers read the murder victim’s stories as if they were one of the fifteen transgender individuals who were murdered this year (see photo).

Multiple events took place across the state. Two vigils were held in Philadelphia, at Drexel University and the William Way Community Center. The Gay and Lesbian Community Center of Pittsburgh also held a ceremony.  Each year more vigils are held in Pennsylvania, more visibility is raised, but the violence continues, and noticeably, becomes more pervasive.

Progress continues to be made within the federal government on transgender issues. Yesterday for TDOR, the White House hosted over twenty-five national transgender community leaders from across the country met with White House staff for the first time to discuss equal rights and violence against trans people. Those in attendance included Pennsylvanian and NCTE Executive Director Mara Keisling, the Trevor Project’s Government Affairs Director Alison Gill, and John Berry, the Director of the Federal Office of Personnel Management. In September of this year, the DC Trans Coalition along with Gays and Lesbians Opposing Violence submitted a statement on transgender issues to a US Senate hearing on hate crimes. The trans leader gathering yesterday by the White House of  is a huge step forward in the visibility of the trans community within the federal government, as well as a hopeful sign for continued efforts to advance legal protections and equal rights for trans Americans.

National leaders in the trans communality gathered in Washington DC to meet with White House staff.
Image from The Transgender Law Center

While great strides are being made for the trans community, in the days following TDOR we continue to see such great physical violence against trans individuals, especially against trans women of color. NCTE and NGLTF’s Injustice at Every Turn survey found extraordinary disparities in healthcare, discrimination, poverty, homelessness, and basic safety compared to cis-gendered people.

Lebanon Valley Students March Against Hate

Thursday afternoon, over 400 students at Lebanon Valley College held a Unity March in response to recent incidents of intolerance and hatred on their campus. On November 5th, upon leaving the classroom and returning, a black student found a doodle of a lynched figure with a darkened face on her seat. During the same week, two lesbian students found the message, “Be normal,” written on their dorm whiteboard. Recognizing that bigotry has no place on their campus, the students, faculty, and staff of Lebanon Valley College banded together to take action.

A crowd of students and members of faculty gathered on the campus social quad with signs promoting love and acceptance. Eight speakers took the podium to reaffirm the campus community’s commitment to fighting bigotry. The group then left the campus and marched through the town of Annville, chanting slogans such as, “No more hate!”

First year LVC student, Paige Riddle, was one of the community leaders chosen to speak during the event and was at the forefront of the march. Riddle was approached by fellow student activist, Tito Valdes, on Wednesday about speaking during the event in regards to LGBTQ students on campus. Hailing from York, PA, where she was the President of her high school GSA, Riddle describes herself as an advocate for LGBTQ rights on campus. She shared with the Keystone Student Voice that she wants to be someone who helps advance the movement for LGBTQ equality in Pennsylvania.

Riddle found the general mood at the march as being very positive, and said that she heard no negative remarks from anyone in attendance.

Bias incidents are an issue on campuses across the state, and far too often go unsolved or unreported. Lebanon Valley College should be commended for taking such a visible stand against intolerance in their community.

 

Victoria Martin is a second year student at West Chester University. She is originally from Shippensburg, PA in Cumberland County. She can be reached at vmartin@pennsec.org.

PSEC State of the Movement Address

Greetings all! This letter was sent to PSEC Coordinating Committee members in preparation for the Fall convening. The state youth meeting November 9-11 at Bucknell University is focused on leadership growth and adaptability. The PSEC Executive Committee asked us to post this publically for you to learn more about the successes and challenges which face youth-led organizing today. PSEC strives for transparency and accountability for the youth represented by the coalition.

 

Dear Pennsylvania LGBTQ Youth Friends,

We are now at a critical turning point in our youth-led LGBTQ movement in Pennsylvania. The direction we will take together is to be decided directly by you and your organizations. Nothing can stop us if we all to rise up and work together toward the change we seek in our commonwealth.
 
To realize the power we have claimed as a generation, we must understand our coordinated effort as an integral part of our leadership. No longer can we see the full equality and safety of LGBTQ youth in Pennsylvania as an outside issue.
 
When we began our joint effort last year to build an authentic LGBTQ youth advocacy community in Pennsylvania, some adults laughed at us. A statewide youth-led LGBTQ advocacy organization had never been attempted before. Many leaders of mainstream equality organizations only saw youth then as pawns for fundraising, incapable of creating change. A small group of us banded together and declared that it was finally our time to rise up and take full ownership of our role in advancing the dignity and equal access for LGBTQ Pennsylvanians.
 
Since then, our partnership with the LGBTQ movement as a whole has experienced incredible progress. We have solidified our bonds with thousands of LGBTQ youth across the state. Our landmark anti-bullying bill, the Pennsylvania Safe Schools Act, has become hallmark legislation in securing the safety of all young people in our commonwealth. We have held numerous statewide conferences to coordinate our efforts. Our presence is deeply felt in Harrisburg and in the communities we have helped change through policy.
 
However, our darkest times are yet to come. We will all be tested in our endurance and strength — by both the oppression we face in society, as well as within the LGBTQ community. It will be up to each of us to remain resilient as we meet our future opposition.
 
If I were to personally respond to all the acts of aggression I have witnessed and been subject to as a youth organizer, I would have little time to do anything else. Indeed, our storyline is so much more than merely a plea to support LGBTQ youth advocacy in spite of the barriers we face because of our age. That would not lift our spirits up as high as we are meant to go. While it is important to be aware of our shared struggle, it will be our self-determination that moves us toward victory. Our perseverance and commitment toward justice will be both our testimony and our source of strength — that a group of young upstarts can indeed lead a state and our county — into a new dawn of meaningful youth empowerment.
 
While PSEC directly represents nearly 50 member organizations in over 30 counties, we see new youth leaders facing difficulty in understanding the gravity of our joint efforts. This is the most prevalent issue which plagues youth organizing: sustainability of effective leaders. For two years since I began this work, I have consistently rejected the notion that youth are weak or unreliable — instead choosing to believe that each of us more powerful than we know.
 
Many of your organizations have new executive boards. At times, some leaders did not effectively transition information to new affiliate members about what it is we are doing together. Let us clarify any misinformation. Your former leaders were official delegates from your community who voted unanimously to form PSEC, wrote the organization’s constitution and founding principles, and believed firmly in our ability to work together toward common goals as GSAs in Pennsylvania.
 
It is deeply concerning to our coalition leaders to learn that some of your organization members have begun to see our collective movement as “outsiders coming in.” We are here because your predecessors willed this coalition into existence. We are here because there is too much unfinished work for us to face alone. PSEC is you, and always has been. Your commitment and vision for a better Pennsylvania is where the promise of our coalition now rests.
 
The time for us to have conversations about the relevance of coming together is now over. It has to – it must be – realized by you. No other individual will light your flame; you must find your own spark and march. As an organizer, my job is only to help provide you the tools which you need. You are the ones to define your destiny.
 
Our collective force is based on the tenant that we are stronger together than we are divided. Whether it is improving our lives on our campuses, coming to the assistance of others in our network, or forming a collective strategy for sweeping change across our commonwealth; the interconnection of our futures is undeniable. When one of us is struck with injustice, so are we all.
 
When a trans youth is beaten after school in rural Crawford County — we are called to unite. When a lesbian student in Scranton is forced out of her foster home and onto the street — we must help her. When a gay teen is bullied to such an extreme he takes his last step in front of a tractor trailer along the Susquehanna River — we must be there to give him hope.
 
We are together in our journey as LGBTQ youth. Our lives are interwoven throughout the farmlands and skylines across the Keystone state. The blood of our community runs through you just as it runs through me. We cannot allow our unity to be perceived so narrowly, as an external presence or merely as an outsourced responsibility for a first year student on your executive board. This must be your own leadership. The stakes have become too high: they are our very lives and futures. All young LGBTQ Pennsylvanians are invested in our coalition — whether they believe in our cause or not.
 
The new leaders we are concerned with have begun varying levels of dissociation in the push toward equality, which has led to uneven levels of participation. We have learned that there is no substitute for full, active, and authentic participation. Without it — in absence of your leadership — our coalition disintegrates. That is why the founding members made attendance as merits for voting power. All member organizations are expected to show up to the table to make informed decisions that drive us forward. Without your input, others are burdened in making decisions on your behalf. Trust amongst us as peers cannot occur if others make decisions for you. These are expectations we must place on ourselves to build an effective advocacy coalition.
 
These new leaders take issue with PSEC as a chore. That between homework, jobs, and on-campus events there is hardly time or interest to involve themselves in connecting their campus organizations with the state. Yet, this assertion distinctly fails to point out the very forms of oppression which lead to youth self-defeatism. Young people are told all through our childhood and school years that we are not strong enough to take on executive leadership. We are put through training programs which are intended to make us ‘the leaders of tomorrow’ instead of the leaders of today.
 
The messages we get as youth are that we are consultants and clients to the non-profit organizations that serve us, and at best, can intern with the organizations that we have interest in. Making excuses time and again for being unable to attend meetings and actions is to accept the labels which society has placed on us: that we are powerless and just do not care enough. In turn, to identify that our greatest challenge lies in our ability to lead our own movement is a difficult task. Bigotry must be combated with unyielding love and driven away — however, our true empowerment can only be generated when personal accountability is met with an unwavering vision for a better tomorrow.
 
We are one with the generations of youth before us who challenged society to lean forward into progress. It was only 50 years ago when students exactly like you and I, sacrificed their lives to have a voice in social justice communities. The women’s suffrage movement of the 1910s and civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s were not driven by charismatic leaders or political action committees — they were secured by ordinary folks like you and I. Their youth components proved to be essential to legislative victories. Together, youth were more than a picket and protest outlet but a coordinated force of change agents. From Stonewall to Act UP — we must not allow our generation to be disempowered or disengaged with our own call to action.
 
As those trusted with the legacy of LGBTQ youth for generations to come, we must realize change starts at home. In many cases, the activities within our organizations have all been done before. We continue to bring the same dozen speakers and performers to our campuses. We screen the same movies year after year. If we continue to reinvent the wheel of our organizations, the change we seek will never become bigger than the auditorium walls holding our largest drag show. We should consider a paradigm shift of our organizations in order to grow our communities. What has never been attempted — until now — is communicating between our groups to build a bold framework for our community. Now, we are raising our power up to the level where legislators listen to our voices, as we unite in Harrisburg, and in Washington DC, to fight for equality.
 
A youth coalition works only when our organizations’ members understand why it is important to turn our struggle into collective action. Like a ship carrying us to freedom, if all of us do not get on board and do what we can to steer us to safety: our boat will not cross any ocean, and injustice will continue to harm those left behind.
 
If new leaders lose sight of this path, organizations will begin to stand in apathy on the sidelines. Indeed, there are those who misunderstand what a coalition is, by expecting it to provide them with services without putting in effort into the collective. Others channel selfishness into their work — individuals for whom personal power and ego is the only thing that matters. I am unable to keep track of how many people have collected community awards by discussing the issues we face, but halting to step into the trenches where we work. These leaders must be guided toward group-centered leadership and shown that progress is possible when we all put in the necessary energy toward our goals.
 
Harvey Milk was a hero to many of us because he stood against those who would seek to make their egos larger than the issues, or make politics out of simple coordination. Milk once said: “Last week I got a phone call from Altoona, Pennsylvania, and my election gave somebody else, one more person, hope. And after all, that’s what this is all about. It’s not about personal gain, not about ego, not about power — it’s about giving those young people out there in the Altoona, Pennsylvanias, hope. You gotta give them hope.”
 
As we were forming our coalition, we knew that our calling has great importance. Believing that we could successfully challenge the LGBTQ movement’s expectations of youth, we knew we had no other choice but to follow through with our plans. While we knew it would be a difficult journey — we took the necessary preparations to ready ourselves for the battles ahead. We started to play with the ‘big boys’ and became an established force.
 
We have sat in numerous meetings with agencies trying to start LGBTQ youth programs that consistently execute programs which patronize or pathologize the LGBTQ youth experience. Many of these fail to address intersectionality, privilege, and the root causes of our issues. We need to be angry, because if not, we are complacent with the current programs which limit our engagement and commodify our identities.
 
As some of you know, our formation was not as seamless as we had hoped. Your organizations stood up to the adult bullies who tried to eliminate us as we were forming PSEC. For years we found ourselves the targets of false agreements by our adult leaders who assured us change in their organizations. Channeling the lockstep of how the National Women’s Party and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee formed from their establishment counterparts, we spent countless hours discussing the weighted decision. Following depraved indifference and explicit harassment by some adult leaders, we opted to transform our informal social network into an independent advocacy coalition.
 
At times, we continue to be intimidated both personally and professionally by members of other non-profit organizations. They see us as uncontrollable kids who could challenge their power. It is the idea of ‘unmanaged’ youth which frightens them. For years they have made profit off of our image — proclaiming they work on our behalf without truly representing us. Our only response has been to meet the adults with an unending capacity for love. In taking the higher road and not responding to their attacks, we become stronger ourselves.
 
I am at a loss as to whether we will ever know why some adults had such contempt for us — or that a limited few number of youth do not yet understand the gravity of these actions. We can presuppose it relates to their leaders’ egos and lust for power. It is non-profit politics, and surely we do not need to engage with it. We may face intimidation, but we must be strong. Political gain is not why I came here to fight, and I certainly do not believe any of us should be concerned with it either. So let us move on.
 
While some may look back on our decision and ask us why we elected to be independent, we can firmly respond with clarity: it was our fate to rise up. They may say, would it not have been easier to rely on adults for your power? The answer is no. Adults cannot speak for youth, only we can. As Audre Lorde said, “the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house.” As youth are relatively unattached people, we are highly mobile and adaptable. Creating our distinct community has helped complement the equality movement as a whole. When there are multiple voices behind a social movement we all become louder. Multiple constituencies employing a variety of tactics can make a highly effective organizing front.
 
We in fact became the first youth-led statewide LGBTQ advocacy organization in the nation. We believed that if we can be successful in Pennsylvania, our model of youth advocacy can be deployed to other states. Should we prove ourselves sustainable, we potentially have a national movement in our grasp.
 
Unfortunately, adultism is just one of many internal challenges within the broader LGBTQ equality movement. Unlike the beginnings of many social justice movements in past eras, the LGBTQ equality community has become a series of well funded non-profit organizations battling each other for limited financial resources and messaging power. Independent grassroots organizing is at a very low level.

How did our movement become a playground for privileged non-profit groups? Dr. Frank Kameny lived a life of modesty and poverty. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. would share motel rooms with other leaders when he traveled. I would respond that it was when we, the average young folks on the ground, accepted this as our reality for the LGBTQ equality movement. It was when we settled for letting our boldest actions to be wearing purple one day a year, or signing an online petition that would never be read by the targeted politician. That we were only to be consulted by these groups in determining an agenda. Our journey with PSEC challenges this entire system by saying: as LGBTQ youth, without being paid, and sacrificing all the resources we can, we are active leaders in this fight.

The mission of our coalition is to make our bonds so close, and our collective vision so clear, that no challenge can be too large for us. The truth is that our state has lagged for far too long on the journey toward fairness and equality. The first LGBTQ equality legislation was a bare bones non-discrimination bill in 1976. Although 69 pieces of equality legislation having been introduced in the General Assembly since that time, not one statutory law currently protects LGBTQ Pennsylvanians. Thirty municipalities have non-discrimination ordinances and a sprinkling of domestic partner benefit policies exist, but again, the larger movement for LGBTQ equality has yet to even begin in the Keystone state.

We have been delayed for decades in our quest to form this movement. Pennsylvanians have been denied the social progress that has been advanced in other states. The absence of progress can only be explained by the sheer lack of coordination and interest of our forbearers. Let us not be classified by historical trajectories or perceptions of youth as unreliable. The time is now, not later, to press on.

Patience to fit this movement into your schedules cannot be a valid option for us anymore. Our lives — and those of thousands of LGBTQ youth – are on the line. It may be easy to dismiss their pleas if you have never been at the end of a rope. However, as LGBTQ youth, we are all inextricably linked with the fact that we have come out. We were faced with societal forces which we were told limited us — made us different or shameful in some way. Together with our many beautiful and different identities we can push together to address racism, ableism, classism, sexism, and religious intolerance. We should know that our actions can directly help save others’ lives. Many of us did not have a support system. Our convergence is a giant helping hand stretching across our state to isolated youth — giving them hope that they are not alone.

I trust in you an admission of our most significant challenge ahead. It is your organization’s very commitment to this common good. We must work to empower all young people – to lift the veil that covers their eyes to the importance of our unity. To those who would feel that this struggle is not relevant to them or not worth their time are themselves the very obstruction that holds our full power back. If we can secure their dedication, our river will flow over any dam that tries to stop us.

It is time for us all to have the courageous and honest conversations with those in our organizations about solidarity. We assuredly have our different opinions — but being unenthusiastic about change is the seed which leads to divestment. It is not why any of us were elected to our leadership posts. Healthy debate amongst us regarding which tactics to employ and campaigns to launch reflects a strong community. However, for us to have leaders in our midst who believe that “equality will eventually come” and “I am not one to do activist things” leaves our cause mired. As we find ourselves less as a meeting of delegates but truly as each other’s keeper — nothing can stand in our way from combating prejudice and bigotry where it exists.

I understand these may be bold claims to make. That some of you may be overwhelmed by, or even taken aback by these assertions. I did not intend to make any of us feel discouraged. Many of us are stretched thin with all our obligations. But we must not lose our hope. For as leaders we carry that hope for countless young people who look us for guidance. Nevertheless, we must deal with these issues openly. We can continue to treat the symptoms of a disease, but only when we all agree to take the antidote will we be able to heal and move forward.

I have been to your campuses. I have walked your hallways and entered your student unions. While visiting I embrace every moment and dream of the day when we organize masses of students to march for the equal rights of all people. Who will come forward to lead your community toward that day? Let us show the world that our capacity to love is stronger than any obstacle in our way.

There is so much for us to discuss and I greatly look forward to seeing you and your representatives at our next state meeting. I have the utmost respect for your leadership and am humbled to take our next steps together to ensure a brighter future for us all.

 

Yours in solidarity,
Jason Landau Goodman
PSEC, Executive Director

Trans murder victims in Philadelphia

The recent shooting of a transgender woman and her mother in the Northern Liberties neighborhood of Philadelphia has left a community wondering when transphobic violence will end, and how much is being done to stop it?

On the evening of October 7th, a transgender woman and her mother were shot in their Northern Liberties home, killing the mother and leaving the woman in critical condition. While the motivation for the shooting has been stated to be robbery, none of the other occupants of the house were harmed. This shooting comes just a month after the murder of Kyra Cordova, a Philadelphia transgender woman who was active in AIDS education and outreach. Two years ago,  Stacey Blahnik, a transgender woman, was found strangled to death in her Philadelphia home. No arrests have been made in the case, nor suspect identified. Likewise, no suspects have been identified in the murder of Kyra Cordova. While we can’t be sure what happened on the evening of October 7th, we can continue to seek answers until justice is found for the victims of transphobic violence.

Rates of violent crime are high in Philadelphia, and affect citizens regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity. However, individuals identifying as trans face higher rates of violence and discrimination in almost every aspect of life, including employment, health care, and access to public services. The lack of government advocacy for trans rights in Pennsylvania, particularly Philadelphia, is disheartening, and disturbing. Trans individuals are just as much citizens as cisgender individuals are, and deserve full protection under the law. It sounds so obvious, yet, statistics show that trans individuals nationwide are subject to mistreatment by the justice system, as well as their neighbors, families, and community.

Washington DC is particularly infamous for a recent series of unsolved murders of trans individuals. However, the DC community is taking steps to make their city more aware of trans issues. This fall, the Washington DC Office of Human Rights launched a historic advertising campaign advocating for respect for all gender identities. While a visibility campaign can’t heal years of transphobic violence, they show that DC is taking an official stand against the hatred of trans people.

Pennsylvania communities need to take a public stand against hate as well. The 2nd Annual Philly Trans March last week was groundbreaking and significantly important for rallying trans advocates. Thinking proactively: an organized City government campaign that promotes the acceptance of trans Philadelphians could help gain widespread support against this violence. While it would not end transphobia overnight, it could be the first step in ending a legacy of unsolved murders.

Victoria Martin is a second year student at West Chester University. She is originally from Shippensburg, PA in Cumberland County. She can be reached at vmartin@pennsec.org.

Former Pittsburgh Pirates Owner Comes Out

Fresh out of the closet locker room! The recent coming out of former Pittsburgh Pirates owner and CEO (from 1996-2007), Kevin McClatchy, shines light on a multi-faceted anti-LGBTQ culture in professional American athletics. McClatchy, who reveals his sexuality today in the New York Times, claims that he was dissuaded from coming out while he was still working in the world of sports by the homophobic attitudes of his colleagues. In an interesting turn of events, McClatchy met his current partner through their mutual friend—a staff member of former US Senator of Pennsylvania and presidential candidate Rick Santorum. Santorum, a notable opponent of marriage equality, is presumably as surprised as we are.

 

While great strides are being made in LGBTQ visibility in the media, politics, and business – even in the military – we still see professional athletics as lagging behind. In 2012, the athletic community has a better chance to lead on the respect and acceptance of LGBT folks than ever. In 1975, David Kopay of the NFL became the first major league athlete to publicly disclose his sexuality. Since Kopay, very few major league athletes have come out as LGBTQ. Both Kopay and McClatchy have expressed that the culture of athletics is largely not LGBTQ friendly. In one extremely troubling incident in 1985, an offensive lineman for the University of Pittsburgh attempted suicide after having sexual urges for another man.

 

Hopefully, McClathy’s recent coming out will encourage more figures in the world of professional sports – both players and their corporate leaders – to come out themselves, and open up an opportunity for dialogue about ending the deep seeded homophobic attitudes prevalent in sports culture. Anyways, isn’t a locker room just one big shared closet?

 

Further Reading: http://espn.go.com/otl/world/timeline.html

This post is by Victoria Martin, West Chester University ’15.

Anti-Bullying Musical in Gettysburg

The Victim, a musical on bullying, becomes an agent of change in Gettysburg.

The Victim, a moving musical centered on school-based bullying, premiered last weekend in Gettysburg. Hundreds of members of the local community filled the Gettysburg Community Theater (GCT) with two completely sold out shows. The musical was conceived, written, and co-directed by Hanover High School student Zachary David Terrazas. The show featured an all youth cast who delivered commanding performances exploring social violence, relational aggression, and domestic abuse.

PSEC, Pennsylvania’s statewide LGBTQ youth organization, happened to have our summer convention at Gettysburg College the same weekend of the show and we were able to send student representatives from across Pennsylvania to the closing night run. Local leaders from the Gettysburg community were throughout the audience, including Gettysburg College President Janet Morgan Riggs. With a strong musical score, Terrazas gives us a deeply personal story that shows bullying through the lens of a victim in which no one, not bully nor victim, is a winner.

The Victim not only reminds us of the perils of bullying; it also reminds us of the resilience and talent of Pennsylvania high school students and the importance of listening to their voice. The production—which has been featured on national news—was brought to life with a spirited, heartfelt performance through the GCT. The theater’s Executive and Artistic Director, Chad-Alan Carr, was kind enough to treat PSEC leaders to meet the full cast backstage, and we were also able to talk to Zachary David Terrazas. The cast members thanked PSEC for working on safe schools advocacy. The performing arts and activism have long been intertwined. For example, in classical music, prominent gay composers whose music has inspired social change with political themes include Aaron Copland and Leonard Bernstein. We are proud to see this tradition continue right here in Pennsylvania with The Victim, a work with huge potential to shape the culture of the communities where it is presented.

The Victim in the News:
Hanover student writes musical about bullying July 27, 2012 (The Evening Sun)

York County teen writes, directs musical about bullying August 4, 2012 (York Daily Record)
Teen’s bullying musical to premiere in Gettysburg August 5, 2012 (AP)

This post was written by Ben Safran, Haverford College ’13.

Chick-fil-A and PA LGBTQ Youth Action














Chick-fil-A’s susceptibility to controversy continues to reach new boiling points.

Post-gaffe, the chicken-centric juggernaut’s CEO has refused to revoke his unpopular remarks made last month disapproving of same-sex marriage, instead opting to focus on pumping-up the company’s “family-oriented” business model, which also happens to be unabashedly religious judging by the meat of its $5 million worth of anti-gay donations. (And those are just the ones we know about.)

But sadly for the company – and fortunately for LGBT supporters everywhere – its business model is proving to be remarkably tragic, with its brand name rating sinking from a score of 65 to 46, based on survey results from the Top National Quick Service Restaurant (QSR) Sector.

This could be because some of the most divisive political figures (see: Sarah Palin and Rick Santorum) are endorsing Dan Cathy’s comments, or it could be because media-savvy youth are unwilling to let the viral story hit a wall.

Chick-fil-A memes, trending topics on Twitter, online petitions – these are just a few of the more subtle ways youth have taken action. But to say the social media movement is merely a “Kony 2.0” course of action might be underestimating the political astuteness and boycotting capabilities of youth.

Youth in Pennsylvania have been rallying against the chain restaurant since controversy first sparked from a restaurant location in Mechanicsburg, Penn. in 2011, resulting in statewide protests from university students more than eager to publicly voice their discontentment.

“When a business is actively working to deny rights to a marginalized group of people, it should be considered discriminatory – regardless of the ‘free speech’ argument,” said William Lukas, co-president of Drexel University’s FUSE.

Lukas, along with other students from the organization, organized a protest in May countering Drexel’s decision to allow Chick-fil-A to participate in a prominent university-sponsored leadership conference, despite what Lukas called otherwise “progressive” steps forward toward improving diversity at the school. The protest consisted of student leaders representing Temple University, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia University, PSEC and more, eventually resulting in Drexel organizing an open-forum LGBT event held prior to the leadership conference.

The protest, among others in the state, was considered a success in a digital era where social media has been undermined to the point of giving youth the bad rap of being lackadaisical in their activist aspirations.

“I certainly think that Chick-fil-A came out of a progressive LGBT blogosphere that now has become mainstream – the story has become a phenomenon,” Lukas said. “So, essentially, with the way we communicate in organizing and activism, [social media] has been huge in connecting people and raising awareness about issues people may not otherwise know about,” Lukas said.

Luis Medina, former GSA president from Bloomsburg University, co-organized a student protest against the presence of Chick-fil-A on Bloomsburg’s campus in the winter of 2011, which eventually garnered attention from a local ABC news station and made waves in their Student Government and the surrounding area.

“Chick-fil-A became a big debate on-campus because of a Facebook group we created; freshmen in particular made an effort to become involved,” Medina said. “The message we really hit home was, ‘Would you eat here if [Chick-fil-A] supported the KKK?’”

These relatively small protests in the past – including a youth-led peanut-butter and jelly sandwich protest held at the University of Pittsburgh in winter 2011 and an unthinkable Pride Week sponsorship from Penn State’s Hub Dining Chick-fil-A —have become amplified two-fold by increased awareness on the Internet since Chick-fil-A’s original round of controversy. Now, nearly two years later, youth are more prepared than ever to turn-out in large numbers in support of equal rights. Eight of the 59 Chick-fil-A locations in Pennsylvania are on university campuses.

Though conservatives across the country reportedly filed into their local Chick-fil-A’s to support the company’s “traditional” values, social media-savvy youth are already being alerted about another counter-protest being organized online by GLAAD : “National Same-Sex Kiss Day.”

“I hope [National Same-Sex Kiss Day] serves as a wake-up call to the rational-minded people out there, who aren’t yet strong LGBTQ allies,” said Ed Coffin, campaign director for Peace Advocacy Network. “In Pennsylvania, it’s legal to fire someone for their job, or evict them from their home for being gay — what’s going on is appalling and LGBTQ folks can’t do this alone.”

Onlookers eagerly await the turn-out of today’s protest, which stands out as one heavily-highlighted example of youth-led and supported bouts of activism, potentially setting the stage for even grander endeavors in the future.

This post was written by Brandon Baker, a student at Temple University. He can be reached at bbaker@pennsec.org.

OPINION: Youth must be catalysts for change

Every November, we witness an all too familiar scene. Politicians become prone to gaffes courtesy of the 24-hour news cycle, middle-aged constituents concerned about tax increases and job security get fired-up with yard signs and canvassing efforts, and youth become…

Silent.

On my way to the gym on Temple University’s campus last week, I stumbled into a wall of on-the-spot voter registration officials, each one boasting a clipboard and a smile that — to the ordinary passerby — screamed “I’m here to interrupt your day” more than “I’m here to help you participate in an honorable public service.” Curious, I humored the apparent poacher who stopped me, a dark-skinned young woman of about 21 who had an endearing smile and a valiant political energy, and allowed her to persuade me to fill out the necessary registration paperwork on the spot.

Granted, I knew I had already registered even as I was dotting my Is and crossing my Ts, but I wanted to see the process “in action,” and that I did. Signing my name and wishing her well, I walked a few feet past her and stood to watch her colleagues fail in their attempts to flag down college students, who rushed by as if their life depended on where they were going. Even more strikingly, I observed as low-income, North Philadelphia constituents who could easily decide the outcome of the election in the fall turned their nose in ignorance to the registration forms waved in front of them.

Why is it so taboo, such an extraordinary hassle, to be politically involved?

A total of 59% of eligible voters between 18-24 are currently registered to vote. Granted, considering only about a third of the United States’ population votes, this is not a terrible number of registrants; however, being registered and actually voting are two very different things.

Consider this: Out of all the folks with a Bachelor’s degree in the 18-24 bracket, only 51% of those people actually take advantage of their voting power. By comparison, 82% of those 65 and older with a degree voted in 2008.

What, then, is the difference between a 22-year-old college graduate, and a 65-year-old college graduate? One might imagine a fresh-eyed 22-year-old being more empowered as a voter with their life ahead of them than a 65-year-old who has, more than likely, already decided their social and financial future.

Moreover, despite the assumed higher level of political involvement in the Northeast, roughly 3% more youth showed up to the polls in the Midwest in 2008, with minority youth from the Northeast being in the bottom half of the voting totem poll.

Mind you, LGBTQ voting trends among youth are not part of that “minority” category, something that sticks out like a sore thumb on a data sheet in this day and age.

I understand that youth may feel as if they “don’t matter” or that their opinion is invalidated by a lack of life experience, but these are insecurities that must be left behind in large numbers if our country is to be properly reflective of its population. In the case of LGBTQ rights, youth must wake-up and realize that representatives will only open their eyes and begin to care when their chances of re-election begin to look bleak because they can’t win the LGBTQ voting bloc. This is a sad but true reality not just for LGBTQ individuals, but all groups of voters looking to boost their whispered voice with a megaphone.

But that doesn’t mean becoming a defeatist, that means working that much harder to put pressure on representatives and grant your voice the clout it deserves.

Youth hold a unique power in today’s democracy that is largely unprecedented: We are fierce, individual media sources capable of influencing more people than most in the 65 and older bracket can imagine. Though your Facebook or Twitter network may feel like an intimate resource for sharing what you had for breakfast, it actually represents your own mass media opportunity to make your voice heard and participate in the political process in a way that can complement your vote.

I plead youth to stop seeking excuses to not be involved, and start seeking reasons to deepen your own involvement and widen the involvement of your peers. Voting is not an opportunity, it is an obligation, and not just for your parents and grandparents.

Despite the gloomy prospects for voter turnout among youth this fall, with a middle-of-the-road president in terms of popularity and a vanilla Republican candidate who can’t help but remind me of Herman Munster, I still remain optimistic that youth will in fact surprise the masses and come out in large numbers in November.

The power of today’s youth is something no politician should discount, and it is their unique responsibility to make that message ring loud and clear when Election Day approaches on November 6.

This post was written by Brandon Baker, student at Temple University and director of communications for the Pennsylvania Student Equality Coalition.

OPINION: Christian school sets dangerous precedent

Sharon Wright’s son came out via an online social media blog nearly three years ago, and ever since then, his Christian-affiliated school has been making nothing but trouble… for both of them.

Apparently, it’s no longer enough for some religious institutions to condemn their homosexual youths as sinners, it is now grounds for expulsion and removal of all involved. But there’s no reason to worry; this Harrisburg mother and teacher is busy making sure we never have to hear about something like this again.

Wright had been teaching full-time at Covenant Christian Academy since 2002 so you’d think she might have had an easier time convincing her school board to let her son finish his final year there. However, when she appealed to them, blame was put on her as well. They told her that it was her job to “fix” her son who was, in their words, “broken.” They went on to say that his soul was at stake and that he “may have been abused as a child” and “didn’t bond with [his father].” She, being an amazing, supportive mother, took all the tedious steps of sending her son through psychiatric and pediatric review. The doctors’ verdicts? His sexual orientation is pre-determined, and the school making him “renounce his sin” could be potentially harmful.

What a shocker.

Ms. Wright kept on sticking by her son and the school simply wouldn’t budge. Naturally, this all took a toll on her. But when she told the school she needed some time to take care of her adjustment disorder, anxiety and depression during the school year, they told her not to bother coming back. And this was after they clearly stated that her employment should not be affected. So here comes the legal system, hopefully, to her side. Wright is using claims under the Americans With Disabilities Act, the Pennsylvania Human Rights Act, and the Human Relations Act to fight against her unlawful dismissal (which we all understand is definitely related to her support of her son’s sexual orientation, rather than her disabilities). She is currently being represented by Solomon Krevsky of the Clark & Krevsky firm from Lemoyne, Pa.

Pennsylvania students shouldn’t have to limit their options when it comes to their education. If Wright’s school gets away with this, it could trigger a chain reaction of other private institutions to commit similar heinous actions against LGBTQ students, faculty, and, as in this case, anyone even associated with them. This is hitting home turf and that’s not okay. Whatever happened to schools being places for nurturing and growth? Let’s keep our fingers crossed that the Wright v. Covenant Christian Academy case wins in Sharon’s favor.

This post was written by Danielle Hernandez, a student at Gettysburg College.

Philadelphia and Pittsburgh prepare vigils for gunned-down Texas lesbians

The Philadelphia and Pittsburgh communities are readying their LGBT armies for two vigils intended to honor the memory of a lesbian couple shot in Texas last week.

The pair had reportedly been seen together in a South Texas park when they suffered bullet wounds to the head, proving to be a fatal wound for Mollie Olgan, and leaving her partner, Mary Chapa, in critical condition. Police have been unable to determine any suspects since the shooting.

The two candlelight vigils will honor their memory and aim to spread a grander message of tolerance, compassion and love. Check below for specific times for the events.

Pittsburgh: Sunday, July 1 from 7 – 8 p.m., located at Northside Park (Brighton Road and Ridge Avenue – next to CCAC)

Philadelphia: Friday, June 29 from 7:30 – 9 p.m., located at LOVE Park, 1599 John F. Kennedy Blvd.

An additional event will be held in Washington D.C. on Friday at DuPont Circle, starting promptly at 6 p.m. A full list of vigils to be held can be found online with Get Equal Texas here.